NAACHGAANA
Garam Hawa and 1947 Earth: Mirrors kept on the two sides of pain
dwnpiyush | April 7, 2012, 1:33 AM | 4 comments | 998 views


In Garam Hawa, the train starts from Delhi and goes to Lahore. In 1947 Earth, the train starts from Lahore and goes to Delhi…

Macro. Micro. Two views of the same world. And within each view, multiple perspectives. And within each perspectives, multiple possibilities with multiple outcomes. The world we live in is utterly complex, and yet the basic human emotions and needs are as simple as they come. The need for acceptance, the need for association, but above all the need to live and breathe in a safe environment that gives them the freedom to live their life the way they want to. Human rights and legislative rights given to citizens of any country wish to fulfill the same aforesaid needs and ensure that each and every human being is in full control of his own story. Story? Yes story. For somebody’s reality is someone else’s fiction. So essentially we live in a world full of interlinked stories that cross path more often than once. And while we are too busy taking care of our own lives, there are people who are doing their indirectly meddling in our affairs. The lawmakers, the leaders, the politicians, the influencers, the media. It has been the same since the start of time. As human beings evolved from being solo food gatherers to creatures who hunted in groups, there were always certain few who emerged more powerful and more influential than others. Gradually they started moving slightly away from the rest of the pack, until they became truly absolute. Since then, the decisions are made by some and accepted by the others. On face value. Yes, there have been revolts. Every now and then the masses have ignited and tried to take the reins of their destiny in their own hands. Some of these revolts have been stifled. A tiny few have succeeded. But even the ones that succeeded have done nothing but create a new set of leaders with new order, new regime, new procedures, but more or less the same results.

Take a look at Mahabharata. Two sets of cousins- the most powerful ones in Jambudvipa (As India was called then), fought for a piece of land. But they were not the only ones who fought and won and lost. With them fought eleven other great kings of India. And with them fought their seventeen different armies. And within each army fought a thousand soldiers. All for what? For deciding who will assume the sole ownership of Hastinapur. Or, to give it a higher purpose as many do- for dharma. Whose dharma? Now when we look back and read the great epic we get lost in the story of revenge and the motivations, learnings, and actions of the Pandavas aided by the God himself- Krishna. But who talks about the innumerable faces that fought the battle? Didn’t all of them have a story of their own? Yes, they did.

Fast forward to 1947. Was it any different from Mahabharata? Yes of course there are many distinctions that can be made; but in essence it was a war declared at the top and fought by the masses. In the process causing nothing but loss. For most, the loss was beyond the tangible. It was beyond the loss of property and life of loved ones. It was nothing less than a complete loss of identity. The human in every human being was replaced by a label- the label of religion. And this label was indicated by the names they carried. So countless people had no option but to change their names. To change their entire identity. To give a new meaning to their meaningless existence. And to serve what purpose? To honor the decision made for them at the top by the leaders. But did they have the option? No. Could they have had the option? No they couldn’t have…

Law and order cannot be enforced without having a stable leadership taking charge of the society. And in the failure of the leadership in 1947, this fact emerged most glaringly. Human beings are no different from the animals of the jungle. In the Jungle there is no leadership- the larger fish eats the smaller one. It is survival of the fittest. Post the 1947 decision to divide India, the most anguished ones became the fittest. Law and order went for a toss. The world became a jungle. There were killings all around. The bestiality in some of the acts was basic, yet almost creative. A man was killed by just ripping him apart. Ripping him apart? The phrase got its literal celebration. The women were raped and molested in the most brutal ways possible. Humanity was reveling in its newfound freedom. The freedom to express, the freedom to revenge. Who ignited the flames? God knows (If there is God, that is).

Deepa Mehta’s 1947 Earth, and MS Sathyu & Kaifi Azmi’s Garam Hawa are two Hindi films that are based on incidents preceding and succeeding the horrific partition of India. Both the movies take a completely different view of the situation. In some ways, both the movies are like mirror images of one another. And both the movies have a narrative that can be viewed in two perspectives. Macro and micro. There was the larger picture that was common to all. But there were millions of people whose life got affected in a million different ways. While Garam Hawa tells the story of a rich capitalist Muslim trying not to leave India for Pakistan post the partition, 1947 Earth looks at the picture from the other side- how Sikhs and Hindus had to leave Pakistan for India post the partition abandoning their homes, their hopes, and their lives. While Garam Hawa is starts from six months after August 1947, 1947 Earth begins six months before that date. While Garam Hawa talks about a family, 1947 Earth talks about a family to be. While Garam Hawa is a story of resignation to fate, 1947 Earth is the story of taking charge of fate- even if it is in the most horrific manner possible. And while Garam Hawa ends on an optimistic note, 1947 Earth ends in the cruelest way possible.

In Garam Hawa, the train starts from Delhi and goes to Lahore. In 1947, the train starts from Lahore and goes to Delhi…

Both are extremely disturbing to see, and yet are a must watch for every Indian my age. They should not be seen as movies. They are like honest recounting of the tales that are our very own. We can never experience what our forefathers did. And we should thank God for that (If there is God, that is). But we deserve to know on what foundation our country stands today. The greatest of structures need the most solid foundations to become great. But for us the challenge lies in making a great nation on a foundation that is full of cracks and that got corroded by blood. The Blood of our own forefathers. The blood that was the result of pain. Pain that was (or rather is) is both figurative and literal. Pain that has been looked at by these two honest artistic efforts like mirrors kept on both sides.

Truly Yours

Piyush Dewan

http://moviesandnomore.blogspot.in/

About the author:
Has 125 Articles

MBA. Electrical Engineer. Film buff. Learning to blog.

4 COMMENTS
  1. dwnpiyush

    Posting this despite knowing that the post would be lost in the flood of celebratory posts on Houseful2. But saw these two movies in a matter of few hours, and couldn’t restrain myself. After watching them a lot of things we do, I do, seem to be so inane, seem to be so pointless. The more of history and mythology you read and experience, the more insignificant your present seems to be I guess.

  2. dwnpiyush

    Today in a feature in TOI (page 16), Aamir Khan lists his 10 favorite Hindi movies. And that includes Garam Hawa. It’s quite impressive he chose a film like 1947 Earth (that was in most ways a poles apart view on the same situation) and gave a most wonderful performance in it- his best by far in my opinion- I miss the Aamir Khan of Sarfarosh, 1947 Earth, Ghulam, Rangeela- even Ishq.

  3. suprabh

    Garam Hawa– I remember this movie for its simplicity more than anything else. It dealt with such a volatile topic of communal feelings and partition in such a subtle manner. Balraj Sahni gave an amazing performance and it was amazing because one could really believe and feel for his character in the film. What all was going through his head– A dying business, A breaking family, an ailing mother, An unmarried daughter, A country about to explode. You could see the tension on his face. A very relevant movie in those times.

  4. dwnpiyush

    @Suprabh

    Agreed, also the way the film followed a bottom-up approach. I mean there was not a single scene or shot that showed the partition from the public point of view- not a single shot of a leader (apart from Balraj Sahni’s elder brother who was a ‘League’i- nor of violence. In fact the movie very beautifully depicts that even in the most turbulent of times, normal issues like a marriage in the family holds great importance- The film, in some ways, had a very progressive outlook- the daughter was encouraged to freely mingle with a prospective groom- the son (Farookh Shiekh) was someone who wanted to create an identity for himself by not participating in his family business- etc.

LEAVE YOUR COMMENT

Back to Top