shetty

shetty | 6 | December 5, 2009 at 10:32 pm | 279 views | NaachGaana Bol| Share

LINK
It was a disheartening Friday, this 4th December. In spite of a bumper publicity blitz, Amitabh Bachchan’s Paa opened to ordinary houses, at many places even dull houses.
While one theory is that the ‘different’ film was never ex­pected to open to bumper houses, the other theory is that it shouldn’t have opened with as low collections as it did. While many cinemas reported an increase in grosses as the day progressed, there was no real news of a jump or a leap.

Be­lieve it or not but there was news from various centres that many among the first-day audience were not aware that Amit­abh Bachchan was the star of the film – neither before entering the cinema hall nor even after watching the film! This is bad news because in the ab­sence of realisation that they have seen Amitabh play the 12- and 13-year-old Auro in the film, that section of the audience may not contribute in spreading the positive word.

For, the joy in knowing that Amitabh has enacted the difficult role is something which the public would not experience if it were unaware of Bachchan’s presence in the film. For, Paa, in their thinking, would be an Abhishek-Vidya starrer with an “un­known” or “scary-looking” actor. Since Amitabh Bachchan is not seen as himself in the entire film, this may prove to be a major setback for the box-office.

It is rather strange that nobody in the entire cast and crew of Paa thought of this ‘lacuna’, if one may use the word. In a way, Amitabh’s brilliant acting may actually go against the film. For, if his performance were not so fantastic, even the now unaware audien­ce may have got to understand that Auro is played by Amitabh Bachchan.

It’s a wonder how nobody in the unit thought of showing Amitabh Bachchan, as himself, on the screen in the end during the rolling titles, probably explaining in short to the audience the procedure in­volved in his makeover from Amitabh to Auro. That would have ensured that those among the audience who didn’t realise that they had watched Amitabh in the difficult role of Auro, would also have gone home duly educated and, therefore, excited about the superstar’s brilliant acting prowess.

Related Posts

WB Komal Nahata : The marketing teams of Paa and Rocket Singh need to introspect over how and why they went so wrong. Just so that the blunders aren’t repeated.

Amitabh Bachchan to direct a film?

Komal predicts all the 2009 awards for Bachchan

Komal Nahata on My Name is Khan economics

W.B Komal Nahata’s review of Paa

There Are 6 Responses So Far. »

1. 

   Tango 5 December 2009
   10:55:40 pm

   

   Some good points he has raised. He knows audience psyche very well.
2. 

   rockstar 6 December 2009
   12:36:51 am

   

   “While many cinemas reported an increase in grosses as the (Fri)-day progressed, there was no real news of a jump or a leap.”

   “It’s a wonder how nobody in the unit thought of showing Amitabh Bachchan, as himself, on the screen in the end during the rolling titles, probably explaining in short to the audience the procedure in volved in his makeover from Amitabh to Auro.”

   lol this is funny and make no sense at all

   btw another major fiasco coming up from nahata after bunty and bubli and rang de basanti this decade
3. 

   Gorilla 6 December 2009
   01:03:02 am

   

   I am surprised at this piece from Komal.
4. 

   MrCool 6 December 2009
   07:38:23 am

   

   Komal Nahata…this is so comical. Audience does not know if Amitabh is acting in the movie. Good Lord!

   Tell this critic to keep quiet if he has nothing logical to say. I mean to view an audience as clueless and stupid is so demeaning to say the least. Oh right, Nahata must be the smartest living thing around.
5. 

   NyKavi 6 December 2009
   08:46:40 am

   

   He must be referring to those that never watch film trailers, promos, etc. and land up at theatres not knowing which movie they are going to see. Otherwise, it beats me how one cannot know that Auro is Amitabh. Even with the prosthetics et al, Auro doesnt look like any other person in the bwood fraternity. Maybe people who have never seen a BigB film before will wonder who that creature on the screen is. What has to be found out is if there really is a sizeable proportion of such people.
6. 

   Angels and Belds 6 December 2009
   09:21:52 am

   

   now – i just read satyam’s review and then read this. I must admit now that Satyam’s review sounds far better

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.