So the whole mindset prepared was of how much sex will be in it as “Lolita” had plenty of that. Obviously this kind of information especially because of Amitji’s presence in the film caused quite a major turn off for a quite a few people. Also the intent of the film was made to seem like it would try to justify an immoral issue whereas very clearly in the film it was just about a man who erred in the face of the strength of a feeling which he could not control at a certain time. No one can deny that such things happen. So the film’s attempt was to say that if it happens it could happen like this too, meaning as in one such incident.
To be frank even I didn’t realize that there could be some such extreme negative reactions to some of the scenes which were quite innocently put. One such instance is when Jiah plays footsie with Amitji under the table which I thought was very cute and funny. But a woman I know became violently angry saying how dare he plays footsie under the table with a girl right in front of his wife. Obviously she identified herself with Amitji’s wife and put that way I guess she had a point. But the real point is that the scene was just one of many such incidents which led to the problem. Anyway the film never tried to be judgmental. It just told the story of a man who just couldn’t control his feelings towards a girl and how he destroyed himself and his relationships in spite of him not intending to do the same.
Read the Entire Post from HERE
There Are 2 Responses So Far. »
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.



2




Caulfield 1 September 2009
09:56:49 am
“One day when I went to meet Mr.Bachchan in his office on a prior appointment he arrived a little late and told me that he got tied up in some work to do with a film called “Cheeni Kum”. I asked him what that film was about and he said that it is a love story between an older man and a young girl. I asked him who the girl was and he said Tabu. I asked him how can be Tabu called young. If the girl should be young she should be very young, not more than 18years old. The seed of Nishabd was sown there.”
So, Cheeni Kum was conceived before Nishabd. And RGV released Nishabd before Cheeni Kum. Smart.
The entire article like all other interviews and articles sounded arrogant. It was full of self praise. I did this, I did that and so on. I really am starting to hate this man.
RAJ 1 September 2009
10:32:12 pm
Next we’ll hear RGV saying”"I am very very proud of Aag”"
The point is who the hell cares which movie RGV is proud of…RGV single handedely have given the maximum number of crapfests as director as well as producre….
Instead of showing your pride towards your old movies better you come up with some good movies which the audince should be proud of…