shetty

shetty | 21 | June 1, 2009 at 10:23 am | 152 views | NaachGaana Bol| Share

1. Aamir Khan 88.60*
2. Hrithik Roshan 54.97
3. Shahrukh Khan 47.65
4. Akshay Kumar 36.86
5. Abhishek Bachchan 32.98

*figures in brackets =average net for their movies since 2007

Related Posts

Bollywood -2009 end round up

Bollywood in crisis: Superstars on ‘idle’ mode!!

MNIK week 2 Box office thread – Disaster or survival

Six stars, two years, Rs 880 crore

Bollywood embraces disability in quest for realism

There Are 21 Responses So Far. »

1. 

   neelu 1 June 2009
   10:29:15 am

   

   The way the strike is going, if they had waited and only used 2009 Abhishek would finally be the top star!
2. 

   Johny 1 June 2009
   10:31:31 am

   

   Lol
3. 

   Johny 1 June 2009
   10:39:02 am

   

   Abhsihek 32.98 hmmmmm

   Guru (45) JBJ (25) LCMD (19) SR (34) Drona (9) Dostana (44) Delhi 6 (31)

   Average comes to 29
4. 

   Brian Charles 1 June 2009
   11:17:38 am

   

   Aamir at no 1 and Abhi somehow squeezed at no 5.

   Now i wonder why the Satyamshot bunch like IBOS.
5. 

   neelu 1 June 2009
   11:27:48 am

   

   It is a question of where you draw the line – why not draw it at 2008 and make Aamir the biggest star to walk the earth, or 2009 and Abhi is the biggest star
6. 

   S T R E E T 1 June 2009
   12:10:59 pm

   

   hahaha.. why’s the IBOS rew such a bunch of jokers!!
7. 

   Rocky 1 June 2009
   12:52:36 pm

   

   Ouch !!!
8. 

   S T R E E T 1 June 2009
   12:58:37 pm

   

   I remember oberoy, IBOS’ creator, would argue on the Pb forum that Bachchan was still the top star in 01,02…and used to put him ahead of SrK in all his lists… ofcourse once Abhishek had his first hit..he’s reverted attention to him.
9. 

   S T R E E T 1 June 2009
   12:59:43 pm

   

   one big hit.. and watch him put Abhi ahead of Aamir on that list.
10. 

    Rocky 1 June 2009
    01:02:27 pm

    

    riiiiight !!
11. 

    KiteRunner 1 June 2009
    02:05:07 pm

    

    By this calculation abhi is equivalent to Akki … wonder his fans will feel about this degradation … IBOS running wild with their imaginitive numbers.
12. 

    RAJ 2 June 2009
    01:53:24 am

    

    What a bunch of loosers this IBOs fellows are…
13. 

    RAJ 2 June 2009
    01:54:18 am

    

    What is avg Net???and how the hell Aamirs net is 88..Can some IBOS joker come here and explain???
14. 

    Johny 2 June 2009
    02:15:26 am

    

    “how the hell Aamirs net is 88″

    TZP 66 & Gajju 110
15. 

    Johny 2 June 2009
    02:16:01 am

    

    “Can some IBOS joker come here and explain???”

    Not one …
16. 

    RAJ 2 June 2009
    02:23:50 am

    

    “how the hell Aamirs net is 88″

    TZP 66 & Gajju 110

    Lol on that count it should be 81 for SRK and should be 71 for Aamir(Considering TZP 33 (as aamir was just a sidekick in the movie)
17. 

    Johny 2 June 2009
    02:29:04 am

    

    “as aamir was just a sidekick in the movie”

    Aamir should get as much credit for TZP as much Macmohan (Samba) got for Sholay if not less
18. 

    RAJ 2 June 2009
    03:09:41 am

    

    “”Aamir should get as much credit for TZP as much Macmohan (Samba) got for Sholay if not less:”"

    You hit the nail right on its head…
19. 

    ritz 2 June 2009
    04:14:24 am

    

    I did not know Macmohan directed the classic movie Sholey and was all over in 2nd half.
20. 

    akshay shah 4 June 2009
    08:09:31 pm

    

    “I did not know Macmohan directed the classic movie Sholey and was all over in 2nd half.”-LOL..well said! Nothing much has changed on NG
21. 

    Johny 5 June 2009
    02:03:25 am

    

    We all know what Macmohan’s character is called in Sholay. Do you remember Aamir’s screen name in TZP? And why bring here director part

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.