author photo

akshay shah



Just the other week I took the Long Tail theory and applied it to Bollywood to show the changing economic structure the Internet has created world-wide, the power of the medium, and how the traditional mould of “hits” and “flops” has changed forever. This is my second piece in an on-going series which further applies the philosophy and science to the ever-changing dynamics of Indian cinema.

India now produces over 850 films per year, which is low in comparison with 450 films produced by Hollywood. Traditionally, 90% of these films have been cliché-ridden designed purely to appease the masses by applying a “masala” formula which consists of action, drama, songs, romance, and comedy all in one. Indian Cinema (apart from the art-house movement in the 70’s) has always been populist trying to have all genres in to one. There’s of course nothing wrong in that and I’m myself a HUGE fan of “masala” films right from SHOLAY (the ultimate Bollywood film and also arguably the most famous Bollywood film of all time) to the recent GHAJINI (which just became the highest grossing Indian film of all time). However since Ram Gopal Varma’s path-breaking SATYA the model changed. Niche films were now starting to be recognized as “hits” as well as being taken out of the category of being “art-house” or “different”. What was traditionally classified as “different” was slowly blurring, and Indian cinema is now at a level where everything is different. Heck it’s in vogue to be different, and film-makers now poke fun at the masala genre with films like TASHAN and JHOOM BARABAR JHOOM.

tashan Master Prazs take: Why Yashraj failed and UTV flourished

Funnily enough both TASHAN and JHOOM BARABAR JHOOM failed. Is it because we’re not ready to laugh at something which will always remain so close to us (masala cinema) despite being cliché and formula driven (the success of GHAJINI shows that in the right mould masala cinema still has the ability to flourish, and that is truly the only way to reach the masses on every level via the medium of cinema), however in the case of the two films I mentioned above it’s a different scenario.

Yashraj Films has forever been known as the most successful and biggest banner and production house as far as Hindi cinema is concerned. The biggest stars, the biggest stories, the biggest songs, the biggest hits, synonymous with quality, and yes….hype that matches quality. Yash Chopra himself is undeniably one of the most respected men in the industry and is also known for his sharp business sense. Even when slow “niche” movement of Ram Gopal Varma was happening, Yashraj was flourishing with back-to-back blockbusters, and even their occasional failures recovered money.

In 2006 Yashraj experimented for the first time in years (ironically it was Yashraj himself who directed one of Indian cinema’s first songless thrillers ITEFAQ) with KABUL EXPRESS with a film which can best be described as part documentary party adventure film. The film met with good reviews and was a moderate success salvaged by WOM which is what Yashraj expected.

KabulExpress1P Master Prazs take: Why Yashraj failed and UTV flourished

By now the creative head and decision maker of Yashraj was Aditya Chopra who had taken over the reins from his father. It was clear that a movement was happening in Yashraj and Aditya Chopra was giving films and subjects which were “niche” by nature a chance. JHOOM BARABAR JHOOM, CHAK DE INDIA, LAAGA CHUNARI MEIN DAAG and AAJA NACHLEY in essence were all smaller scale niche films with some interesting stories at hand..The problem? Marketing and advertising. The Long Tail is a niche environment, if something naturally catches on by WOM (which it did with CHAK DE INDIA) then it’s a true “hit” however the problem here was Yashraj had taken what were traditionally “niche” topics, advertised them as their “typical masala blockbusters” which meant audiences were getting a mixed bag. NEVER try and market a niche product as a blockbuster one. Niche by sheer definition is designed to appeal to a small segment of people and audiences feel ripped off no matter how big the stars are. The other problem that started happening was creativity was starting to be marred. In trying to appease both markets, Yashraj has failed to impress either. 2008 saw an even bigger flop with the hugely hyped vehicle TASHAN (again marketed like Yashraj’s previous blockbuster DHOOM 2) however again TASHAN and DHOOM 2 were in totally different markets. The same can be said of BACHCHNA AE HASEENO which in the promos looked like a “typical rom-com” however turned out to be a BROKEN FLOWERS type introspective film which infact pulls apart the rom-com genre Yashraj had created.

Solace came to some extent in the form of RAB NE BANA DI JODI. The film’s story in essence is a small one, and the film itself went for the 70’s genre of small, light-hearted, feel-good films. However given it was directed by Aditya Chopra himself and starred Box-office superstar Shahrukh Khan which automatically meant media and public perception would be that of a “big” film. However, smartly enough, the movie was underplayed right up to the release. It opened to a good response, and through WOM had a long, successful inning at the Box-office. YES! FINALLY Yashraj had got the marketing right (though this could be due to default as at the same time the Mumbai terror attacks happened) and they had managed to retain that “small” image for the film which went on to be a success via WOM. The problem? Popular media and their mindset expected a record shattering opening, followed by some huge numbers in consecutive weeks, again not possible in the Long Tail niche environment where your biggest strength and weapon is WOM. Some analysts were calling it a “disappointment” while others wouldn’t give the movie its due until month’s after its release.

new rab ne bana di jodi07 Master Prazs take: Why Yashraj failed and UTV flourished

In the bigger picture, the entire paradigm was changing. Yashraj no longer had the monopoly of being the biggest and most reputable banner with the likes of Karan Johar’s Dharma Productions in the picture (an ally to Yashraj to a larger extent as they operated in a similar fashion and similar genres). However the emergence of a then “small” company called UTV was quickly catching everyone’s attention.

UTV entered the market without much fanfare in 2004 and initially had a mix of small and big films in its kitty. Smaller films like HYDERABAD BLUES 2, D, MAIN MERI PATNI AUR WO, CHUP CHUP KE and KHOSLA KA GHOSLA were marketed correctly, came with little to no fanfare, however majority found some level of success at the box-office due to good WOM, and simply for being quality products. They also occasionally had a big film like SWADES and RANG DE BASANTI which came with the associated “hype” of a big film, but again the focus was on quality and WOM. UTV slowly realized that their key strength was quality+correct marketing+WOM. Films like KHOSLA KA GHOSLA, LIFE IN A METRO, MUMBAI MERI JAAN, A WEDNESDAY, FASHION, OYE LUCKY..LUCKY OYE, AAMIR, WELCOME TO SAJJANPUR, and DEV D all became box-office successes to varying degrees and the key thing to note was that all films were “niche” and small films which weren’t going for the “blockbuster” affect. These films met with rave reviews, created genuine Online Buzz and WOM spread for these films like crazy hence in some cases the films attained a cult following of sorts.

awd1 Master Prazs take: Why Yashraj failed and UTV flourished

UTV (headed by the extremely bright businessman Ronnie Screwvala) is undoubtedly a force to reckon with and within a short span of 5 years had become a household and reputable name which associated itself with quality, is proud of being different for being different, and above all for delivering exactly what it promises. Smaller budgets, less focus around large-scale advertising campaigns and relying more on Online hype, WOM and user generated discussion also ensured that UTV can churn out more films at the same time, and the production model grew rapidly. UTV now operates under 2 names. UTV (the original which focuses on the bigger films) and UTV SPOTBOY (which continues to deliver the smaller niche films).

1) If you’re going for the “niche” market-be true to yourself and your audience and be proud in doing so. NEVER MARKET A NICHE FILM AS A BLOCKBUSTER.

2) Quality over big stars and hype! As the Long Tail points out:

Top Rank: Blockbusters will always be there though they maybe less than they were before, big hits will never die.

Middle Rank: Films which are either big on hype, but low on quality, films which are “small” films disguised as “big films” will flop faster than ever. The masses now have the power to write back via blogs, forums, and Social Media and a product which is trying to cheat the audience will be uncovered faster than ever. This explains how some films like CHANDNI CHOWK TO CHINA and even SINGHH IS KINGG fizzled out in its second week alone.

still1 500 Master Prazs take: Why Yashraj failed and UTV flourished

Bottom Rank: The tail end of the long tail will flourish. Smaller, independent film-makers who have a good sound story, no stars, but have true quality product on hand will flourish again with the same mediums as mentioned before…and the ultimate weapon of all….WOM!

Master Praz

There Are 7 Responses So Far. »

  1. 3 Belds 24 April 2009
    01:15:33 am

    Comment Arrow

    awesome awesome article akshay/master praz. this is an extremely good read. thanks for this.

    so let me add a few points. by and large i think you have covered most reasons – but i think there is another critical one. i think yrf did not have a handle on costs – they spent way too much on their ‘niche’ movies. If you see the difference between the niche movies of UTV vis-a-vis YRF – what junps out at you is the star case and therefore the cast. YRF always went with the star obsessed model – be it the A league guys or guys like saif/john/abhishek/madhuri etc. films like aamir and wednesday succeeded because they were made at shoe string budgets so even a few crores business stood them in good stead. I dont have the patience to do this but i would dare say that if you look at the top line – YRF movies have made significantly more than UTV movies but they have had more flops because the costs of the movies have been too high

  2. Tango 24 April 2009
    01:40:30 am

    Comment Arrow

    Great write up Master-Praz. Very well analysed.

    Unfortunately Ronnie too is becoming haughty off late, as per people. Cannot say if it is true or not.

  3. RAJ 24 April 2009
    04:21:13 am

    Comment Arrow

    Fantastic write up Akshay..

    Beld..Agree with your points regarding cost structure of YRF vis a vis niche movies..Even KJo goes overboard on budget..UTV has done well as far as budgeting is concerned..But i am sure ..with recession all the big banners would learn about shoe string budgets…

    Adversity makes a good businessman efficient…

  4. akshay shah 25 April 2009
    05:37:20 am

    Comment Arrow

    Beld: well said, and that again comes down to marketing a niche as a blockbuster. Yashraj believed that could take movies which are small in essence, use huge stars, give it a budget makeover and kill the creative freedom to make a quick buck, which in turn meant the movies ended up being neither way to some extent.

    UTV is no doubt very cost focussed, and apart from JA one never hears of them going totally over budget!

  5. Gorilla 26 April 2009
    08:01:43 am

    Comment Arrow

    excellent writeup akshay bhai.

  6. sandy 28 April 2009
    11:12:20 pm

    Comment Arrow

    Yup, Yash Raj is still a major production house but it has severly lost clout in the last two years. They haven’t even brought out their annual calender this year since they hardly have any releases in 2009.
    Yes, they’ve had two big hits but almost all their other films have come a cropper – and all these have been reasonably big budget films. And it’s not only about them being flops. Most of them have been such indifferently made films.
    Which is why more than real numbers, YRF has taken a beating in terms of industry and audience perception in my view. The coming of UTV is not perhaps a challenge to Yash Raj and Dharma in pure monetary terms or profit margins (though it will be soon) but more in terms of what each of them have come to stand for – one as forward-thinking and the others as the last leg of Bollywood’s star struck legacy. This is debatable but that is the perception.

    UTV have promoted and produced several small films which have done very well – also on quality, they have delivered more often than not.

    Where major banners always relied on big to mid-level stars, UTV at least made a beginning choosing scripts over stars, which is what has held it in good stead.

    YRF obviously have the resources and they will bounce back but undeniably, they have been going through one of their worst times in the last two-three years. In 2006, I doubt any big star would refuse a film from YRF. Even Aamir was tempted to do Fanaa with them. Today, I’m not so sure if Hrithik, Akshay or Aamir will be so keen to make space in their date diaries. Heck, I’m not even sure SRK will. :-)

  7. rockstar 28 April 2009
    11:24:52 pm

    Comment Arrow

    well in short its quality vs regressive movies

    utv backed all the genres with the emphasis on quality

    infact when they where into television there they produced some quality stufff there to

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.