[welcome to the ultimate indian film community]

Link

Like all well-told fairy tales, Jodhaa Akbar takes you on an epic journey into the heart of a man and a woman. The historical setting just adds to the colours, the sights and the sounds. And for the fun the designers have had with the costumes.

To watch Jodhaa Akbar for historical accuracy is pointless. To watch it for any brilliant display of camera work or special effects is futile. Because chances are you may be hugely disappointed. Especially if you have seen other Hollywood historicals or epics on the screen. Rather, watch it for a simple tale of love.

(Also read Review1: Why you should sit through Gowariker’s dream project)

Akbar, is unlike his bloodthirsty and tyrannical predecessors, and believes in winning the hearts of people rather than conquer them by force. And what inspires him to transform himself, and in effect alter the destiny of the Mughal empire, is his own intent and one woman’s love.

To say this is Hrithik Roshan’s finest performance till date will be no exaggeration. If you have seen him in Yaadein, or for that matter Koi Mil Gaya or even Krrish, you will see how much he has matured. Scene after scene, frame after frame, Hrithik dominates.

If he is the steely emperor of Hindustan, leading his fearsome army one moment, he is the vulnerable lover, longing for the intimacy of his wife in the other.

Watch out also for the scene that seemed to be a gift to all Hrithik fans, in which he is taming a rogue elephant. And much later when he takes on his backstabbing brother-in-law, the climax of the film (well, there is no ‘battle’ to end the film on a high).

Juxtapose that with the sequence when he duels with his wife, all-playful, all-mischief, all-flirtatious. And you will have seen a range of emotions that very few actors will have displayed in a single film.
Almost.

Because our vote for the best scene would go for the Khwaja song. In this, Akbar is getting married to Jodhaa and a group of Sufi singers perform, as if in trance. As Rahman’s voice rises to a crescendo in the background (Khwaja Mere Khwaja on screen can give you goosebumps), there is a moment of epiphany for the emperor. He gets up, moves slowly towards the dancing dervishes, their white skirts twirling in the moonlight. The crowd watches in awe as the emperor joins them. His face a picture of beatitude, bliss, and his body, a picture of humility and submission to a force beyond this world.

The restraint and grace displayed by the actor is truly commendable. Especially since, it would have so easy to go overboard. In a film that is nearly four hours long, you can go home with some such gems. Aishwarya Rai, as the Rajput princess, looks every bit a fairy tale princess. She looks pretty and emotes well, though there are very few scenes with her actually. She does a rather good job of the action sequences, with the swordplay and at times the word play. She is never the wimpy weepy princess who is ‘offered’ as a peacemaker to a Mughal emperor. But rises in his esteem as a woman whose pride and honour are of utmost importance to her. She humbles her man, teaches him how to love and in the process falls head over heels in love with him. Now, if THAT is not romantic, what is?

Jodhaa Akbar belongs to Hrithik. Take for example the scene in which he is practicing swordplay, his taut muscles rippling, eyes afire. Watching from behind a sheer curtain is Jodhaa, who had till then resisted his advances. The sheer magnetism of the man is enough to add colour to the Rajput princess blanched cheeks. You understand why she lets out a gasp.

Ash-Hrithik as a pair: Certainly one of the most good-looking screen pair we have had in recent times. And you know something? They seem to bring out the best in each other. Even when the two maintain a distance from each other, letting gauzy curtains fall in between, the chemistry is so palpable, you can cut through it.

Towards the end, when the marriage is actually consummated, comes a scene straight out of a fairy tale again with the sun casting its rays on a gilt-edged mirror and Jodhaa standing before it, all aglow. Jodhaa Akbar say those magic words to each other for the very first time and what follows is a love song. Shot aesthetically, the song captures the sensuousness of the moment beautifully, and leaves you wishing you could see more this couple on screen.

Supporting Cast: A word here for these supporting actors. If you have seen Sonu Sood in Aashiq Banaya Apne, you’d forgive him for the earlier travesty in the name of acting. That chap holds his own as the troubled, tragic cousin of Jodhaa, as does Nikitin Dheer, as the brother in law of Akbar. A word here also for Ila Arun, as the ‘dai’ of the emperor, whose possessiveness and scheming mind make her the kind of ‘saas’ Ekta Kapor would have died for. A huge let down is Poonam Sinha, Shatrughan Sinha’s wife, whose guest appearance as Akbar’s mother makes you wonder what made Ashutosh cast her in the role.

Verdict: A must watch, if you are a sucker for fairy tales and a Hrithik fan. And of course, if you can sit through (approximately) three hours 40 minutes.

Rating: 3/5

Bookmark and Share

  1. jayshah

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    I don’t get the gradings at all. The reviews are superb, like one earlier, but the grades are lower.

  2. som

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Most of the reviewers seem to be having problems with the length and pace of the movie.

  3. satyam

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    The length issue is in one sense overrated. The question is always one of ‘narration’. Lagaan was breezy even at 3 hr 45 min. Other films can bore one to death at 2 hr 30 min. What is however true is that with greater length the probability of the narrative being looser is more likely. But it isn’t a consistently good narrative that suddenly becomes ‘too much’ because of length. But audiences also need to have more patience. I personally don’t have issues with length in any film whether it’s 2 hrs, 3 hrs or 6 hrs! In fact in many instances a longer film despite a flabby narrative can nevertheless be richer than a more tightly edited film. I think with JA Gowariker would ideally have made a 4 hr film and I would have been all of it. Unfortunately in India we’re not treated to director’s cuts on DVD.

  4. jayshah

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    ‘I personally don’t have issues with length in any film whether it’s 2 hrs, 3 hrs or 6 hrs!’

    Doesn’t surprise me Satyam! :-)

  5. ILG

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Re: I personally don’t have issues with length

    You may not but The Skeptic AKA The Size Queen does, given the agonizing discussion from the other day.

  6. satyam

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Jay: LOL!

    I’ll make another confession. I prefer longer films, assuming they’re well made!

  7. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Re: “given the agonizing discussion from the other day.”

    It wasn’t THAT long.

  8. jayshah

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Q – to correct you. Agonising doesn’t necessarily mean long :-)

  9. ILG

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Q,

    You shoulda put LONG in upper case.
    Come on, he went on and on and on. He is a head case for sure.

  10. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Re: “You shoulda put LONG in upper case.”

    Ahh, but that would be crude (see, e.g., Jay’s response above :-) ). Plus, you know how we desis speak English — keeping that in mind, upper-case makes sense…

  11. jayshah

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    I felt like correcting a lawyer…doesn’t happen often. If the opportunity arises, I must take it !

  12. ILG

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Re: Plus, you know how we desis speak English

    Well, TS seems to know how we Desis write it too. That guy is something. What a waste, tho. Honestly, such a smart, well written, informed guy. But looks somewhat screwed up.

  13. jayshah

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    ‘But looks somewhat screwed up.’

    This is the doctor in ILG coming out !!!! TS is one of the bright spots in the shoutbox. Plus he does well to keep some level of harmony in there.

  14. ILG

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Re: TS is one of the bright spots in the shoutbox.

    I would go further. He is an underworld legend. But…….
    Anyway not fair to scriticise in absence.

  15. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    TheSkeptic is one of my favorite NGites/shoutboxers, although I could do without comments on other people’s English usage, which I feel border on the inappropriate…very insightful person indeed.

  16. Tango

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Agree. From my limited interaction with TS, I find him intelligent, erudite and accomadating, unlike my Valentine.

  17. rks

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    LOL…For once we are talking about SB member, otherwise it is other way round.

  18. ILG

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Re: although I could do without comments on other people’s English usage,

    Thats OK,Q. Propriety is over rated,anyway.
    Inspite of some disagreements, I still think, he is as you say insightful and gifted/talented.

  19. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    I dont hav ea problem with long length…specially for epics…thats my biggest prob with EKLAVYA!

  20. rks

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    In ShoutBox
    TheSkeptic: Q, reading some of the “gossip” on myself among you, ILG and jay, I acknowledge your criticism of my criticism (!) of the English-usage of others. My “case” is this: Being a lifelong reader of all kinds of prose in English has rendered me extremely sensitive to matters of style, syntax and grammar. And trust me, while this sensitivity is perhaps greater than that of the average netizen, it comes nowhere near even kissing the feet of that great skewerer of modern prose, B.R. Myers. Nevertheless, this sensitivity is in fact the bane of my online existence, since I’m wincing and cringing almost incessantly while browsing, particularly when reading Indian forums (so much so that I now never venture into particularly abysmal ones such as indiafm.com, and only infrequently visit passionforcinema.com). The pain is almost physical, much like, in cinematic matters, the annoyance I feel on seeing the overused zoom shot (in the 70′s and 80′s), or the mic sticking into the frame etc.

    TheSkeptic: And yet, I’m also aware that it’s considered rude to correct others in this regard (and by extension, in any regard?), and I do keep my counsel 95% of the time. The language-related outbursts that you sometimes see from me are only when a certain erroneous prose habit is so aggravating, yet so invisible and chronic to the user (“perpetrator”?) that I think it is only the right thing to pass on what I happen to know. Better me than, say, a real-life supervisor or potential employer, who might be in a position to inflict material damage as opposed to merely a hurt ego. I have myself been corrected on occasion (and, no doubt, will continue to be), by Westerners, in the course of online conversations, and I was (and will be) glad to learn what no one previously had pointed out to me, perhaps precisely because of the “politeness” protocol that you invoke.

  21. ILG

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    TS,
    Get a handle on yourself, dude.
    Dont get your pink panties in a painful knot over punctuations and periods.
    Its only language. Your painfully belaboured ‘prose’ is worse than the other so called linguistic crimes.
    Re:Better me than, say, a real-life supervisor or potential employer, who might be in a position to inflict material damage as opposed to merely a hurt ego.

    Gonna let that pass as thats so f***ing laughable!

  22. Rocky

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Re.-Dont get your pink panties in a painful knot over punctuations and periods.

    Or Else- they may turn Red????

    kaun hai teh TS, Did I miss the agonising debate?????

    Based on what RKS has copied here surely looks like an Angry Old Man !!

  23. rks

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    I think ILG and TS have talked after this. It was amiable discussion.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE