Sham Shanti Om
From the skeptic in the shoutbox. This is from Tehelka
Link
Sham Shanti Om
A film historian finds that Om Shanti Om is hardly the tribute to 1970s Bollywood it claims to be. By SMM AUSAJA
As the year was wrapped up, we were told that Farah Khan’s Om Shanti Om has trounced Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s Saawariya at the turnstiles, to emerge as “the biggest grosser ever in the history of Indian cinema”. Modesty, even in seventies, existed I’m sure. When I say ‘we were told’, it’s what the publicity managers want us to believe.
Curious to ascertain facts I turn to a trade journal to know the figures myself. I pick up Complete Cinema and the percentages of the third week are as follows: Mumbai 65%, Delhi 60%, Kolkata 55%, Allahabad 28.01%, Lucknow 48%, Udaipur 28.05%, Ujjain 21.91%, and so on. While these figures may be approximate, they don’t correspond with the enthusiasm with which the film is being publicised. And the figures of Bombay Talkies’ Kismet, K Asif’s Mughal-e-Azam, G P Sippy’s Sholay, Manmohan Desai’s Amar Akbar Anthony, Rajshri’s Maine Pyar Kiya, or even Yash Chopra’s DDLJ, were I’m sure better in comparison. However, the cinema business has changed so much in the last decade that it’s all a first week affair these days. So the length of a film’s run doesn’t necessarily become a yardstick of its success. Om Shanti Om is a huge success, and the marketing blitzkrieg unleashed on its pre-release days deserves substantial credit.
To discover what has made this film such a success, I venture into the nearest multiplex, burning my pocket with popcorn worth Rs.60, and a ticket worth Rs.300. When the movie ended I see a mixed reaction amidst the audience. What makes the film succeed is its wacky humor, Deepika Padukone – an honest performance, Shahrukh Khan’s south Indian ‘Rascalaa’ avatar, and the brilliantly choreographed songs by Farah herself – the one where Deepika dances with digitally presented yesteryear stars, and the magnificent title track reminding you of the John Jaani Janardhan track in Manmohan Desai’s flamboyant Naseeb (1981). So the film has merit to succeed and a dependable screenplay (Mushtaq Sheikh with Farha) compliments the success. What angers a seventies buff is the idea to call it a tribute to seventies.
Having grown up in seventies and eighties, queuing up for Manmohan Desai/ Prakash Mehra flicks, with Salim-Javed dialogues celebrating the Amitabh Bachchan years, and R D Burman on the record player, I was curious to see if the film is an apt tribute. It is not. The film opens with a Karz song, which belongs to the eighties, not seventies, since the film was released in 1980. The characters sport a longish hairstyle – sported by Shahrukh and Arjun – yet their ears are visible! In the seventies, the hairstyles covered the ears. Then there are spoofs on stars like Dev Anand (fifties and sixties), Manoj Kumar (sixties), and Sunil Dutt (sixties, including Amrapali) which don’t fit in the seventies era at all, since these stars were at their prime way before seventies!
Lets now move to Disco. They show Shahrukh gyrating to a disco track called ‘Dard-e-Disco’. If we rewind, Disco arrived in the west in the seventies indeed, but in India, its unquestionably an eighties phenomenon. Feroz Khan’s Qurbani ushered in the era of Disco on the Indian silver screen with Nazia Hasan’s ‘Aap jaisa koi..’ storming the charts. It was released in 1980! Hari Om Hari followed this from Pyara Dushman the same year. In 1981 came Nazia Hasan’s Disco Deewane, Ramanand Sagar’s Armaan with Ramba ho, Nasir Husain’s Zamaane Ko Dikhana Hai with Poochho na yaar kya hua, Rakesh Kumar’s Yaarana with Saara zamaana, haseenon ka deewana, and Sunil Dutt’s Rocky with Aa dekhen zaraa. By the time we reach 1982, Disco was everywhere, from a Paan shop to the HIG drawing room. The phenomenon bloomed on popular patronage with Disco’82 from Ravi Tandon’s Khud-daar, Disco station Disco from Surendra Mohan’s Hathkadi and Jaane-jaan from Barkha Roy’s SanamTeri Kasam. As we reached 1983, Bappi Lahiri delivered the baap of all Disco albums – B.Subhash’s Disco Dancer! The association of Disco with seventies is therefore blasphemy!
Finally lets look at the icons of seventies – two stars dominated the era unchallenged – Rajesh Khanna and Amitabh Bachchan. From 1970 to 1973 it was Rajesh Khanna all the way. In 1973, Prakash Mehra’s Zanjeer hit the theatres with Salim Javed’s Angry Young Man exploding the screen. Amitabh Bachchan arrived in style, and took no time to be crowned the numero uno, a position he hasn’t vacated since then. With Deewar, Trishul, Kabhi Kabhie, Sholay, Amar Akbar Anthony, Don, Muqaddar ka Sikandar, Suhaag, Adalat, Mr Natwarlal, Kaala Patthar, Do Anjaane, Abhimaan, Mili, Khoon Pasina, Hera Pheri, Majboor, Adalat and the endearing Chupke-Chupke, the Amitabh phenomenon – to quote a celebrated gay critic, “snowballed into a cult”, standing heads and shoulders above the rest in the decisive seventies decade. In the film claiming to give a tribute to the seventies Bollywood, there is no trace or hint of Amitabh Bachchan ever having influenced the era. Shame. I am also surprised at the film critics who ignored the fact that elements from other decades are also blooming in the seventies Bollywood created for the celluloid.
Posted on January 11, 2008








Comment by satyam on 11 January 2008:
Thanks to theskeptic for alerting us to this. I made similar points here:
http://www.naachgaana.com/2007/11/13/om-shanti-om-and-the-masala-wrestle/
OSO is a fairly silly film and quite passable. So I don’t quarrel with people who enjoyed it. But I always found it offensive that Farah called this a ‘tribute’ to the 70s and moreso that everyone seemed to swallow it from the media to even some filmmakers.
Sadly there is to much to rant and rave about when it comes to contemporary Bollywood culture and how much can I criticize others when Bachchan himself called it a great tribute. A man who lived through the 70s says this! Bachchan simply ‘endorses’ everything in sight.. but that’s another matter..
Theskeptic has made points along these lines but one way to read the entire ‘tribute’ aspect of OSO is to suggest that the entire film is a ‘machine’ designed to efface Bachchan! The old Karan Johar move in the media and so forth has been to efface any history not represented by ‘Bachchan’ and to then call him the ‘emperor’, SRK the ‘king’ and then have SRK graduate to the ‘emperor’ level eventually, presumably when Bachchan can then be made into a celestial being.
But Farah goes one step further and does it more cunningly. She retains the other Bollywood aspects as this ’spoof’ and omits Bachchan. As such when he shows up for the awards later it’s the strangest moment in the film. Almost as if the ‘real’ had suddenly confronted us!
Comment by satyam on 11 January 2008:
thanks Sujith for putting this up..
Comment by Arun on 11 January 2008:
Interesting facts! Thanx for posting, Sujith!
Comment by rahmaniac on 11 January 2008:
Good article - the thing I would disagree with is about Dard-E-Disco … it is picturised on the modern day version of SRK and hence is AFTER the 1980s - no goof-up there … but the rest, the less said about the farcical OSO the better !!
Comment by akshay shah on 11 January 2008:
I said the same thing in my review…i didn’t find OSO to be much of a tribute to the 70’s!
Comment by ILG on 12 January 2008:
Interesting article.
It is certainly not a tribute.Something so trashy cannot be a tribute to anything except Farah’s lack of vision and class.
It is an attempted humourous (!) take on eighties Bollywood
but devoid of the pure masala fun that it offered.
Comment by satyam on 12 January 2008:
A nice film about the ‘movies’ (though it isn’t a tribute) is Hrishikesh Mukerjee’s warm Guddi.
More recently I was extremely disappointed by Khoya Khoya Chand. The representation of the 50s was again very inauthentic. I expected better from Mishra. For all its flaws I have a great weakness for HKA.
I was in fact flabbergasted when Soha appeared on Saregama and elsewhere and suggested that actresses worked much harder in the 50s as they also sang their own songs! I don’t know of anyone male or female (barring Kishore Kumar!) who was acting to his/her own songs. The actor/singer more or less totally disappeared after the mid to late 40s. I thought to myself, here’s an actress who playing a part in a movie that recreates the 50s, here’s an actress whose mother belongs to the industry and she doesn’t even know something as elementary as this. I guess it wasn’t Lata and Geeta Dutta and Shamshad in the 50s but Nargis and Madhubala and Meena Kumar and whoever singing their own songs!
Even otherwise a lot of these films about the industry tend to be obsessed with the affairs and sex lives of their protagonists. This is not surprising as this reflects the typical bourgeois predilection in these matters. Guddi was a charming movie that gently deconstructed the industry and its image in the eyes of a star-struck girl even as it otherwise made it very endearing in another sense.
Comment by rks on 12 January 2008:
I liked KKC for the drama. I didn’t care about the veracity of what is being shown.