(Courtesy: The Skeptic at SB)
It is very easy for anyone to miss the strengths of Saawariya. I am aware that most of the reviews are negative, which is fair enough as everyone is entitled to their opinion. And here is mine.
The first and the foremost important factor to understand about Saawariya [Images] is that it is not a movie with a story; it doesn’t carry a definite structure like prose. It is sheer poetry, and with poetry, abstractness becomes all the more personified. Poems cannot be judged, they can only be felt. It’s like seeing a rosebud bloom into a rose.
And judging poetry as prose is a gross mistake; and this is precisely what happened with Saawariya. Reviewers or the so-called connoisseurs are not able to see the poetic nature of the Saawariya, which I think is the very pivot on which the movie has been made. Unfortunately, the visual-poem is over-shadowed partly due to lack of understanding art and partly due to unwarranted comparison with Om Shanti Om.
Saawariya doesn’t have a strong subject; it has a very ordinary storyline. And yes, direction is not strong enough to carry the emotions to the common man. However, one can watch Saawariya in an altogether different dimension, which was what I did. The visuals are so poetic and painting-like, that I am sure an artist would melt witnessing the shades of blue and green in the film.
In fact, the movie gives you a feel of the musicals — like a poem sung and expressed through the medium of flamboyant sets and paintings. There is an innate subconscious soul to the entire movie — the soothing bluish-green tints and neon lights, the lovers’ bridge around which all emotions are poured and the poetic surrealism of the paradise like city having tones of ancient Venice.
Omung Kumar, who worked on the sets deserves applause. If not for him, Saawariya would have been the worst film of the year. Omung has taken a quantum leap in creating a city that has the feel of extreme surrealism, completely unconventional to what we have seen before, extravagantly rich in aesthetics, vividly blended with shades of grey and bluish green.
Mellow lighting infiltrates throughout the city through streamers, blinkers and vintage-styled lamp posts. The statue of a magnanimously etched Buddha illuminated with natural fire-sticks and diyas takes a central recognition amidst several intricate objects of art that encapsulate the magical city. The entire movie is shot in darkness to give it a dreamy and mesmerising effect. The character of Rani Mukerji as a call girl only personifies the night-feel and gives strength to the overall soothing dream the audience can witness. Monty’s musical score too adds to the whole mesmerising experience.
There are many noteworthy scenes from the film. For example, the one where Ranbir Kapoor and Sonam Kapoor are floating in love and ecstasy below the mammoth statue of Buddha. Cinematographer Ravi K Chandran cuts this situation through the top shot of Buddha, and for a moment you are lost in that world.
Then there is a wide-angle shot of the city at night where Ranbir introduces Sonam to look at the melting silence of the night. A train hoots with smoke billowing from its chimney, and that is indeed a classic shot.
But the one which launches you into a world of absolute bliss is the scene where an emotional Sonam is seen running through the dark alleys of the magical kingdom with bluish-green pebble lights flashing around the corners. The music is so powerful, that for a moment it forces you to change the opinion of the whole film to be a classic of its own kind. Then the camera dissolves, fades and cuts to the semi-lit caves literally floating.
To sum up, Omung Kumar, Monty and Ravi K Chandran are the real pillars of Saawariya. As for Sanjay Leela Bhansali , he deserves to be neglected.
There Are 7 Responses So Far. »
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.



7




Nitesh 21 November 2007
11:57:25 pm
This is an excellent review.
“the movie gives you a feel of the musicals — like a poem sung and expressed through the medium of flamboyant sets and paintings”
These are nice expressions.
Enjoy this concluysion-
“To sum up, Omung Kumar, Monty and Ravi K Chandran are the real pillars of Saawariya. As for Sanjay Leela Bhansali , he deserves to be neglected.”
Nicely summed up. The review itself is like a poetry and a lovely one…to some extent like Saawariya
henry 22 November 2007
07:44:13 am
It is grossly unfair to neglect Bhansali. It is his vision that has been realized by his team (quite beautifully I must add) and needless to say, without his courage, a film like Saawariya would never have been made.
Other than this disagreement, I loved your review.
satyam 22 November 2007
07:57:24 am
Wonderful piece here…
I agree somewhat with Henry’s point on Bhansali.
Elvis 22 November 2007
08:06:57 am
Agree with Henry.
And the review.Am just glad that atleast some people ahve been able to understand and appreciate what Saawariya brings to screen.It is an uncompromising film made with conviction by someone who really believes in what he is doing.Regardless of its BO fate (which is dismal)its worth twenty OSO’s if not more.
satyam 22 November 2007
08:18:56 am
Though I have still not got around to the review I am extracting an earlier comment here:
“It seems to me that in his ‘dreamscape’ (and I will extend the point in my review) Bhansali perhaps offers a truer counterpart to Dostoevsky’s own city of white nights (st petersburg) than either Visconti’s Venice or the coastal community in Iyarkai (of course this is a much looser adaptation). Because the Dostoevsky story is very much concerned with the notion of the ‘dream’ and his choice of place offers an appropriate ‘objective correlative’ (not very precise but it will have to do!) much like Bhansali’s marvelous sets.
For those unfamiliar St Petersburg in summer (which is when and where both White Nights and the ‘nightmarish’ Crime and Punishment are set) has sunset beginning around 9:30 PM or so and then twilight lasting till midnight. Dawn comes in around 4 AM and a pre-dawn light suffuses the skies much earlier. Essentially there are only 2-3 hours of darkness! Incidentally some of the Scandinavian countries offer similar spectacles (they are on similar Northern latitudes). Norway is often called the ‘land of the midnight sun’. “
henry 22 November 2007
08:33:01 am
I haven’t seen OSO yet but I heard it’s good fun…will try to catch it this weekend.
satyam 22 November 2007
12:12:26 pm
Qalandar wanted me to add this comment here:
“The problem with this review is that it basically cnceptualizes “poetry” as removed from thought, and the move is to negate any criticism of the film’s intellectual mediocrity as an attempt to judge it by “prosaic” standards. No poetry judged significant by lovers of poetry would fit this schema.”